JRV - I hope that I can help h
JRV - I hope that I can help here, from an electrical engineering perspective. 1) Your concern regarding reverse polarity in a dead battery versus reverse polarity in a well charged battery is interesting, but I am unable to assess the consequences without a great deal more information. Not trying to evade the issue, but the voltage seen on the power bus (I use this term to describe the vehicles +voltage side for all equipment) will be the algebraic sum of the two battery voltages (when placed in series and reverse polarity). Thus, if the bad battery is at 8 volts, and the good battery (12.5 volts) is connected in a reverse polarity, the bus will momentarily see –4.5 volts. Momentarily because one of several things will happen; a) the offending technician (I try to be benevolent) will evacuate one of several body orifices and realize the mistake, or 2) the lead post or plates will get so hot as to melt and/or expand rapidly (explode). This technician has created an infinite current situation that will last for only so long.
Your concern about the alternator of the helping-car putting out too much current (70-80-90 amps) is quite valuable from a pedagogical perspective. This is a common misconception that current drives issues, or voltage drives issues, but it is important to understand when a source of electricity is a constant current source or a constant voltage source. A load by definition will only draw as much current as its apparent resistance will allow. This is very important, and if you understand this, then you know more about Electrical Engineering than I learned in 5 years of higher education. A load (a computer, a spark plug, a radio, head lights, etc.) has an apparent resistance. Each device has two wires. Disconnect these wires, look into the device sighting down the wires, and what resistance do you see? I am trying to make a mechanical metaphor, but simply stated, each load looks to the circuit as a resistance (in direct current) or impedance (in alternating current). How much current the device will ALLOW (draw) to pass through it is defined by the simple equation known as Ohm's Law; current through the device will equal the voltage applied divided by the device resistance (load). Now here is the important part. Nowhere in this equation does it suggest that a source (of current) that puts out 70 amperes will PUSH less current through the device than a source that can put out 90 amperes! The only caveat is if the source is a CONSTANT CURRENT SOURCE, and this device in question is THE ONLY LOAD IN THE CIRCUIT. In that scenario, yes, whatever current the source puts out as a constant current source will be rammed through the load (with certain qualifications).
Alternators are current sources (NOT VOLTAGE SOURCES). So it would seem, that all of the above discussion should be for a constant CURRENT source. Here is the trick. All of the current is directed to the battery, where the current moves electrons of the lead acid plates, causing the battery voltage to rise. IT IS THE BATTERY THAT SUPPLIES VOLTAGE TO THE BUS, not the alternator. The battery wants to look like a constant voltage source, and Ohm's law applies (Voltage=Current x Resistance; rearranging, current=voltage/resistance).
Now to your thoughts about low voltage and hot components. Unfortunately, it violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (I never liked that law anyway). The statement suggests that by applying less voltage you can generate more heat (no no no, can't do that). What I think you are trying to say is that for devices requiring so many Watts of power (the product of current and voltage), that when less voltage is applied, you must deliver more current. Heat loss in a device is the product of the current squared multiplied by the resistance. More current, more heat. But, if the load looks like a resistance, and you lower the voltage, then by Ohm's Law you will have less current flow and less heat. Yes, there is a voltage below which computer components won't work, but it is not due to heat.
Now on to Jeff Ryerson's input. The current that is used by the various loads in the car is supplied by the battery. The alternator simply raises the battery's potential (read voltage) to supply that current. Your concern is well founded, but for a slightly different reason. I do not like to jump-start a dead battery for only one reason: the low bus voltage will cause the voltage regulator to send high field current to the alternator, which will flog itself in an effort to put out current to charge the battery. Now, mind you, the engineers that design this stuff are pretty smart, and I trust that they designed the alternator to put out as much current as it can for as long as it may need to, but diodes and shellac insulation (windings) are not great fans of heat (high current). Thus, when I jump-start my car, I am careful to watch the ampere meter to keep the charging current below 20 amps if possible. It will only take a few minutes for the battery plates to be sufficiently charged that the charging current will fall, but I prefer that the regulator does not ask the alternator to pump out 80 amps for a long period of time. It's okay at a stop light for a few seconds after idling, but not for 5 minutes.
Whew, time flies when your having fun. Hope I haven't over stepped my invitation.
Jim S.