G
Guest
·For those few of you following
For those few of you following the Weber carburetted 3.2 saga: To review, we are now putting down about 224 rwhp ( about 270 crank assuming 17% loss )with a way too rich mixture (A/F around 11 and richer - idle A/F is 11.2). The current mix is 150 F24 190 .6.
Today's project will be installing new Weber jetting, mostly following David and JRV's suggestions:
34mm, 145, F24, 200, .55
I had a set of F36s ready but broke a tab and will need a replacement. Noticed that the 6 and early 8 cyl Dinos used F24s while the later 308s went to F36. Will have a set of 140, F36, 220 pre-made and ready to swap in (or mix and match) by the time I hit the dyno later this week if these are still too rich.
I realize that FI has many advantages, but for all you folks let me tell you - at least for me, these Webers are fun.
Stay tuned for new dyno numbers when I can get on.
For those few of you following the Weber carburetted 3.2 saga: To review, we are now putting down about 224 rwhp ( about 270 crank assuming 17% loss )with a way too rich mixture (A/F around 11 and richer - idle A/F is 11.2). The current mix is 150 F24 190 .6.
Today's project will be installing new Weber jetting, mostly following David and JRV's suggestions:
34mm, 145, F24, 200, .55
I had a set of F36s ready but broke a tab and will need a replacement. Noticed that the 6 and early 8 cyl Dinos used F24s while the later 308s went to F36. Will have a set of 140, F36, 220 pre-made and ready to swap in (or mix and match) by the time I hit the dyno later this week if these are still too rich.
I realize that FI has many advantages, but for all you folks let me tell you - at least for me, these Webers are fun.
Stay tuned for new dyno numbers when I can get on.